New link in the top of page "IRC Chat".
Register | Login
Views: 135450420
Main | Memberlist | Active users | Calendar | Last Posts | IRC Chat | Online users
Ranks | FAQ | XPW | Stats | Color Chart | Photo album
11-21-24 06:54 PM
0 users currently in Help & Suggestions.
Xeogaming Forums - Help & Suggestions - There should be a code... | |
Next newer thread | Next older thread
User Post
Bitmap

#1 Enhancement Shaman US Ravenholdt








Since: 09-05-04
From: His Laughin' Place

Since last post: 4556 days
Last activity: 4550 days
Posted on 10-20-07 05:27 AM Link | Quote
Where it tells you the estimated time to reach the #1 highest post count on the board.

Weird Idea. But I think it would be interesting.
FX

Zombie Marco








Since: 03-24-06

Since last post: 3830 days
Last activity: 3725 days
Posted on 10-20-07 12:51 PM Link | Quote
That would be damn near impossible. The estimated 5000 posts is easy, because it just takes your average post count per day and figures it out. But being #1, it would have to take the post count of everyone else on the board.
Spartan

Metal battleaxe
Is back. Kind of.








Since: 11-15-04

Since last post: 88 days
Last activity: 77 days
Posted on 10-20-07 01:53 PM Link | Quote
*cough*

Its possible
*cough*

It would take alot of code though, If it were something like Gmod were it reads to the SqL database and it takes your average playtime in then averages everyone elses and it will tell you who will be were....in say a week?

I'd look into it but like meh..
FX

Zombie Marco








Since: 03-24-06

Since last post: 3830 days
Last activity: 3725 days
Posted on 10-20-07 02:09 PM Link | Quote
True, but considering the number of variables, it would require some sort of algorithm, as opposed to figuring out 5000 posts, which is just 5000-current posts/posts per day+current date.
Lord Vulkas Mormonus

Vile
High Xeodent of Xeomerica.








Since: 10-29-04
From: North Carolina, United States. World, Sol System, milky way

Since last post: 94 days
Last activity: 94 days
Posted on 10-20-07 10:05 PM Link | Quote
There is also that fact that only if you had a post-per-day average higher than the average poster would that work.

In other words, Nagis, it wouldn't apply to anyone. Xeo's 5.8 posts a day record pwns us all.
FX

Zombie Marco








Since: 03-24-06

Since last post: 3830 days
Last activity: 3725 days
Posted on 10-21-07 01:08 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Vulkar
In other words, Nagis, it wouldn't apply to anyone. Xeo's 5.8 posts a day record pwns us all.

Not true, I had a 7.6 posts per day for a long time.
Bitmap

#1 Enhancement Shaman US Ravenholdt








Since: 09-05-04
From: His Laughin' Place

Since last post: 4556 days
Last activity: 4550 days
Posted on 10-21-07 03:28 AM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Most Lucent Gesar
Originally posted by Vulkar
In other words, Nagis, it wouldn't apply to anyone. Xeo's 5.8 posts a day record pwns us all.

Not true, I had a 7.6 posts per day for a long time.



You guys are obviously not understanding my power.

Break it down! Wiggy chigiggdy bow wow!
Xeoman

Ball and Chain Trooper
Administrator








Since: 08-14-04
From: 255

Since last post: 87 days
Last activity: 76 days
Posted on 10-21-07 03:28 AM Link | Quote
Back in my prime I think it was at least in the 15's or something.
Kard Ayals
The Ultimate
Lv108
Posts2915
Counter2
Mv7Jm26
Hp2189/2189
Sp709/709
Atk361 Int279
Def389 Spd281
Hit254 Res275
Exp13446964
Next73535
Banhammer
Shining Armor
Admin Shield
Judge Hat
Admin Shoes
POWAR

Posted on 10-21-07 08:36 AM Link | Quote
It wouldn't take that many variables and stuff, and if the post average if the user is lower or equal to that of the #1 poster, you just output "never" else it wouldn't be that complicate, but considering I don't even have an FTP client installed...
Next newer thread | Next older thread
Xeogaming Forums - Help & Suggestions - There should be a code... |



xeogaming.org

AcmlmBoard 1.92++ r4 Baseline
?2000-2013 Acmlm, Emuz, Blades, Xkeeper, DarkSlaya*, Lord Alexandor*
*Unofficial Updates
Page rendered in 0.124 seconds.
0.029