New link in the top of page "IRC Chat".
Register | Login
Views: 122485020
Main | Memberlist | Active users | Calendar | Last Posts | IRC Chat | Online users
Ranks | FAQ | XPW | Stats | Color Chart | Photo album
03-28-24 12:54 PM
0 users currently in General Chat.
Xeogaming Forums - General Chat - 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' repeal just passed the Senate | |
Next newer thread | Next older thread
User Post
Rogue
If you're reading this... You are the Resistance











Since: 08-17-04

Since last post: 395 days
Last activity: 204 days
Posted on 12-18-10 04:21 PM Link | Quote
And Obama is definitely going to sign it.

Thoughts?

'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' directed that gays and lesbians had to hide their sexuality in order to serve in the U.S. military.
Phoenixocracy

The one true Xeodent








Since: 01-08-10
From: Xeomerica

Since last post: 1457 days
Last activity: 1457 days
Posted on 12-18-10 04:24 PM Link | Quote
Does this mean everyone can be open about this in the military? I've been hearing so much about this on the news, and I hate that it kept getting denied. Why does it matter if the person you're serving next to has a different sexual preference than you?
Xeoman

Ball and Chain Trooper
Administrator








Since: 08-14-04
From: 255

Since last post: 18 days
Last activity: 20 hours
Posted on 12-18-10 05:17 PM Link | Quote
+1 for Obama if he does sign.
Rogue
If you're reading this... You are the Resistance











Since: 08-17-04

Since last post: 395 days
Last activity: 204 days
Posted on 12-18-10 05:33 PM Link | Quote
Originally posted by Phoenixocracy
Does this mean everyone can be open about this in the military? I've been hearing so much about this on the news, and I hate that it kept getting denied. Why does it matter if the person you're serving next to has a different sexual preference than you?

I'm not sure. But my boyfriend who is more up on these things than I am mentioned reading an article which interviewed Marines about having opening gay people serving alongside them. Something like 83% of Marines who say they have served with someone they were sure was gay said they didn't care and it didn't make a difference to them.
Xeoman

Ball and Chain Trooper
Administrator








Since: 08-14-04
From: 255

Since last post: 18 days
Last activity: 20 hours
Posted on 12-18-10 05:53 PM Link | Quote
As it rightfully shouldn't!
Cairoi
This isn't about you and your loud mouth,
This is about me and my fucking beard.








Since: 08-29-04
From: PA

Since last post: 4610 days
Last activity: 4233 days
Posted on 12-18-10 07:33 PM Link | Quote
Awesome, but the fact that this was even a debate sickens me to the bone.

The DREAM Act, which would have passed some grand immigration form, fell through. :/
Rogue
If you're reading this... You are the Resistance











Since: 08-17-04

Since last post: 395 days
Last activity: 204 days
Posted on 12-18-10 09:04 PM Link | Quote
Just to be sure the facts were correct, I looked it up and the Washington Post writes:

"... 84 percent of combat arms Marines who had served with a homosexual said that there would be no effect or that the effect would be positive."


SOURCE
Katana

Dark Wizard
\"She said tonight...come on come on collide...see what I fire feels like..I bet its just like heaven.\"








Since: 08-15-04
From: Philadelphia, P.A.

Since last post: 1316 days
Last activity: 1133 days
Posted on 12-18-10 11:44 PM Link | Quote
While this sounds really good in theory...and in practice...I don't care too much for these statistics. They're only going by what people SAY.

I am not against gays and lesbians serving. I am, however, cautious about putting my "vote" to something I couldn't particularly live with someone. So, at this point, I'd just keep my fingers crossed to the "pioneers" so to speak of this act being passed. I know plenty of assholes who were kicked outta the military for beating nearly to death people they even assumed were gay. And, while 80-something percent looks good, I wanna see 80-something percent PROVE that they don't care. In fact, it bothers me that they don't care. They SHOULD care. Because whether they're gay or not, they're serving beside them. So, everyone SHOULD care that these people are stood up for, not just persecuted. And yes, "these people." If they're allowed to be open about their sexuality, that unfortunately forms a new group. And that's just sad.

I'm speaking more objectively than subjectively here, by the way. :p I cringed when I typed "these people."
Rogue
If you're reading this... You are the Resistance











Since: 08-17-04

Since last post: 395 days
Last activity: 204 days
Posted on 12-19-10 12:50 AM Link | Quote
I see it in much the same way most people see race these days. You have an African-American man in your unit, you don't go, "Wow, awesome! A black man! Suh-weet!!" You just don't think about it, therefore you don't care and race is not a high priority to you so long as everyone's putting in their all alongside you.

And that's how the majority of those wanting to do away with 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' probably see it -- that you just shouldn't care what a person's sexual preference is, along with what color their skin is what god they pray to (or don't).

But in the sense that you mean, yes, they should stick up for the rights of these downtrodden to be represented. That's what America is SUPPOSED to be -- the land of the FREE and the home of the brave.


(Last edited by Rogue on 12-19-10 12:51 AM)
True Flight

The One








Since: 08-21-04

Since last post: 2663 days
Last activity: 2648 days
Posted on 12-19-10 05:17 PM Link | Quote
You know I sort of thought of the DADT policy as something different. More of a protection for those who are gay. Where I'm from soldiers in benning who go through basic have been known to be your typical bible belt guy. There are reports of soldiers who have been stabbed and what not. DADT was made so that gays and lesbians can join the army how ever it seems that it was also made so that gays and lesbians can't be bullied or beat up.

I have worked with gay, lesbian, and bisexual soldiers. It doesn't make a difference to me. DADT is something I really don't care about. Seriously. DADT is fooey to me. Now that they can serve openly... weeeee well What ever.
Rogue
If you're reading this... You are the Resistance











Since: 08-17-04

Since last post: 395 days
Last activity: 204 days
Posted on 12-22-10 10:56 AM Link | Quote
Obama signed the repeal today.



EDIT: One more well-worth sharing.



I love this president.


(Last edited by Rogue on 12-22-10 11:00 AM)
Cteno

Super Shotgun
Moderator








Since: 01-11-05

Since last post: 1601 days
Last activity: 722 days
Posted on 12-22-10 01:05 PM Link | Quote
Originally posted by SPC Flight
You know I sort of thought of the DADT policy as something different. More of a protection for those who are gay.

I always figured it was this way myself. Who cares whether or not if you're openly gay while serving? The only ones who care are the ones who are going to start problems so use some common sense. It's cool if you like to be who you are, but don't go announcing "I'm gay!" or "I'm the black guy!" or "I'm a sentient llama come from another dimension to destroy your pathetic human race!". It's just not called for, not in my opinion.

My biggest concern is that nobody gets hurt because of this, I've known some pretty damn ignorant and intolerant people go into the service who might do something stupid. They're that last 26% and the other 25% or so who weren't interviewed or gave a false report.
Hiryuu

Goomba








Since: 10-30-10

Since last post: 4798 days
Last activity: 4695 days
Posted on 12-26-10 01:22 AM Link | Quote
I think the way you swing and what you're doing in your bunker is the last thing most people care about when you're on a battlefield.

Also nothing against people of that venture, as many have said in the thread, but the political correctness and people going 'oh look what rights I have now because I'm a minority' kind of grate on my nerves a bit. Now this isn't everyone that I know in cases like that but such people do exists, because I've read the comments to stories such as these. They're pretty short-sighted and pretty stupid comments no matter how you slice it - this is the military for crying out loud.

Of course, I'll probably get even more points off for saying that women shouldn't serve in the military. Not saying that they are lesser or not capable of actively serving whatsoever, but it's battle and it's war. It's something women should never be part of, in my wholly honest opinion...and I say this with the respect that a cousin of mine is with the Marines and is very skilled at what she is and who she is...but I still believe she should have never been a part of that for those reasons alone. Although her reasons are altruistic in wanting to serve the country she lives for, which I wholly understand and praise her for, it still should not be something a woman ever has to go through.

Just my opinion. Not something I want to say 'enforce' one way or another...especially in an era of political correctness where one 'short-sighted' comment will spell your doom with anyone you talk to that is incredible sensitive and/or close-minded to ideals.
True Flight

The One








Since: 08-21-04

Since last post: 2663 days
Last activity: 2648 days
Posted on 12-27-10 11:44 AM Link | Quote
LBGT Soldiers can't come out for 60 days. Have fun!
Next newer thread | Next older thread
Xeogaming Forums - General Chat - 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' repeal just passed the Senate |



xeogaming.org

AcmlmBoard 1.92++ r4 Baseline
?2000-2013 Acmlm, Emuz, Blades, Xkeeper, DarkSlaya*, Lord Alexandor*
*Unofficial Updates
Page rendered in 0.222 seconds.
0.039