 New link in the top of page "IRC Chat". |
| Register | Login | |||||
 |
Main
| Memberlist
| Active users
| Calendar
| Last Posts
| IRC Chat
| Online users Ranks | FAQ | XPW | Stats | Color Chart | Photo album |
|
| | ||
New link in the top of page "IRC Chat". |
| Register | Login | |||||
|
Main
| Memberlist
| Active users
| Calendar
| Last Posts
| IRC Chat
| Online users Ranks | FAQ | XPW | Stats | Color Chart | Photo album |
|
| | ||
| 0 users currently in General Chat. |
| User | Post |
| True Flight Posts: 3860/5245 |
Originally posted by Cyro Xero *watches Xero* Quack... 1 quack... 2 quack... 3... 
QUAAAAAAAACK 4 4 quacks... It takes 4 quacks to get to the center of a tootsie pop. =P |
| Ryan Posts: 1685/1748 |
Originally posted by Rogue Those things are normally down to the activities the person performs, when they perform them and other related activities they may have performed in the past. i.e. a person who watches football with their father from a very young age is likely to enjoy football when they are older. I have many examples of this with people I know. The only ones who like football are the ones who's parents enjoyed it while the child was growing up. Originally posted by Rogue Although there are examples of other mammals partaking in homosexual activity, along with sex for fun. Dolphins for example. I've also heard of a kind of monkey which for 90% of the year the males are homosexual, although my source for that is a bit dubious. I've seen male cats and dogs attempt to mount other males. The only difference is the human capacity to consider such themes in distinct ways, depending on the person's own lifestyle, and also to be capable of criticising what may be natural instincts. |
| Rogue Posts: 5349/11918 |
I honestly don't know if homosexuality is a genetic thing or not. I mean, is it in your genes to not like certain foods? Certain colors? Certain sexual positions?
I really don't think being gay is a choice. If you don't like girls and you happen to love men, sure you can choose whether or not to "come out," but you can't control those feelings. And homosexuality doesn't just occur in humans. The moral overall is to simply be who you are on the inside. There have been too many suicides from people "in the closet" who just didn't know how to act on the feelings they had. |
| Ryan Posts: 1679/1748 |
Wow, once again religious logic shows its ugly face... Arguing that homosexuality is the same as fucking ducks?
I mean, to compare two rather different things... There's a big difference between an attraction to the same gender and sexually assaulting a bird. The debate between whether homosexuality is a choice still continues, but that makes it irrelevant. If life to a Christian or whatever religion this TV channel is about free will, give homosexuals the free will to choose to be who they are. And if it isn't down to choice, then they can stop talking about it completely. A bit of a tangent here, but... Either way, a homosexual isn't affecting those who aren't. True, occasionally, a gay man might hit on a straight one but if the straight man has any ounce of sense of right and wrong in his brain, making a fool of the gay man (How Christianity does it) is hardly the optimum way of doing this. A simple "Sorry man, I'm not gay" would suffice, and both parties are happy. The gay man doesn't waste his efforts or gets his feelings hurt, and the straight man doesn't have the awkward position of being hit on by another man. So if it's down to choice, the homosexual choice doesn't make any difference to the 'god-given law and moral abiding' Christian, and if it's hardwired from birth (Although I personally think it is a mix between how sexually active a person is, and the events that lead up to and occur through puberty which causes fetishes, which I do count both hetero and homosexuality under) then they can stop arguing over it entirely. Either way, the topic seriously needs bringing to a close. Too bad such a thing would never occur. Heck, I know all about things like that developing with the whole macrophilia thing that's developed within my mind, and I can give a detailed list of possible instances which have influenced my mind to enjoy such sexual images, or to derive sexual emotion from such themes, and I have a good feeling I slowly became bisexual through my endeavours into macrophilia. It's hardly a bad thing, I'm not hurting anyone, except maybe people's eyes after they've read through this post. Neither thing is destructive in any way. |
| Rogue Posts: 5333/11918 |
Originally posted by Junpei Jones Agreed. 
Hehe, Cyro's a duck fucker. Bwahaha!! |
| Cyro Xero Posts: 1677/1779 |
Let me fuck the duck. You guys just sit there and count the quacks.
|
| 天国JOE Posts: 2528/2999 |
Maybe not, it'll probably take it at least a little while to die.
Oh, we are just awful. |
| Rogue Posts: 5331/11918 |
Yeah, but then you get one good thrust. Then it's sex with a dead duck... or at least one that will be when the internal bleeding gets the better of it.
Crossing bestiality with necrophilia? Kinky! |
| 天国JOE Posts: 2527/2999 |
Originally posted by RogueThey have an opening on their backends, right? Then isn't it obvious? |
| Kyoku kun Posts: 1116/1329 |
I'm sure there's a manual. |
| Rogue Posts: 5327/11918 |
How does one fuck a duck, though?  |
| Kyoku kun Posts: 1115/1329 |
I just that video recently. It's Brilliant. |
| Rogue Posts: 5326/11918 |
OK, here's the deal. Pat Robertson, host of the televangelist show 700 Club (that only comes on because it's a sponsored program like every infomercial out there), who's also said things like 9/11 was the fault of gays, lesbians, feminists, pagans, and the ACLU, all of that... he pretty much said that allowing gays more freedom and safety would lead to acceptance of pedophilia and bestiality.
I give you one of his sex with ducks rants: As unconstitutional as it would be to outlaw preaching against homosexuality, I actually clapped my hands and shouted, "Awwwwright!!" Ahem... Anyway, Pat kinda opened himself up to some satire there. Enter female duo Garfunkel & Oates: |
