New link in the top of page "IRC Chat". |
Register | Login | |||||
Main
| Memberlist
| Active users
| Calendar
| Last Posts
| IRC Chat
| Online users Ranks | FAQ | XPW | Stats | Color Chart | Photo album |
| |
0 users currently in Entertainment. |
User | Post |
True Flight Posts: 2961/5245 |
well if Mama Gates is planning on having her class see it for extra credit I'm going with them. XD |
Rogue Posts: 3677/11918 |
So apparently this opened this last Friday.
Anoyone seeing it, or is this a wait-until-cheap-theaters kinda film? |
FX Posts: 2677/3775 |
Originally posted by King Cairoi A motivational speech before battle does not make it like Lord of the Rings. Braveheart had one, King Arthur had one. |
Rogue Posts: 3616/11918 |
See, that was when the believability went out the window for me. I wondered why they were suddenly splicing Queen Elizabeth I with Joan of Arc, but oh well.
It's funny. A couple years back, I remember pondering on it being cool if there were a sequel made for Elizabeth because I wanted to see her dealings with Philip II and Sir Francis Drake, but hey, close enough with Raleigh. |
Elara Posts: 4608/9736 |
The difference is that Lord of the Rings is fiction. I don't think armored queen part is very realistic, but otherwise it looks interesting and I want to see it. |
Cairoi Posts: 2558/3807 |
Okay, that movie honestly looks REALLY bad to me. It looks like they're trying to take English History and turn it into Lord of the Rings.
I mean, the speech at the end? I smelled Aragorn. |
Rogue Posts: 3613/11918 |
I remember being really into Elizabeth, the first movie, when it came out the same year as Shakespeare in Love. I was horribly annoyed that Gwenyth Paltrow won Best Actress over Cate Blanchett (ironically, both ladies starred opposite Joseph Fiennes, who wasn't nominated for anything).
Anyway, I look forward to this one. Costumes, sets, and such: exquisite. Historical accuracy: optional. |