New link in the top of page "IRC Chat".
Register | Login
Views: 124540708
Main | Memberlist | Active users | Calendar | Last Posts | IRC Chat | Online users
Ranks | FAQ | XPW | Stats | Color Chart | Photo album
05-03-24 10:56 AM
Xeogaming Forums - - Posts by Logos
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32
User Post
Logos

Again?
Banned








Since: 07-24-06

Since last post: 5902 days
Last activity: 5992 days
Posted on 10-12-06 03:05 AM, in LOL SKITTLES Link
Is it the shell, the insides, or both that taste different? I have never pondered upon skittles. I like the orange ones best. But I can tell them apart, no problem.
Logos

Again?
Banned








Since: 07-24-06

Since last post: 5902 days
Last activity: 5992 days
Posted on 10-12-06 04:10 AM, in Pokemon Music Video Link
Simple, he died laughing, and yet he speaks. The voice synch was especially convincing for some reason. In a horribly exgagerated sort of way. Good AMV, in that sense, and high marks for humor.
Logos

Again?
Banned








Since: 07-24-06

Since last post: 5902 days
Last activity: 5992 days
Posted on 10-12-06 11:25 PM, in Hooray, life sucks! Link
Too bad there are so many scholarships in sports, and so little in academics, when sports really doesn't have anything to do with a career for the majority, or so it would seem. So yeah, I can't do sports.
Logos

Again?
Banned








Since: 07-24-06

Since last post: 5902 days
Last activity: 5992 days
Posted on 10-12-06 11:35 PM, in Japanese Link
Mind explaining the ~na to bunpou, VG-sensei? And thanks for the confirmation.
Logos

Again?
Banned








Since: 07-24-06

Since last post: 5902 days
Last activity: 5992 days
Posted on 10-12-06 11:40 PM, in TV Shows link Link
Originally posted by Sexy Awesome
Here.

Its all good, all directing to YouTube and all. So yeah.

You sir, are a saint. Now I can watch Simpsons again. o=
Logos

Again?
Banned








Since: 07-24-06

Since last post: 5902 days
Last activity: 5992 days
Posted on 10-12-06 11:50 PM, in Ragnarok Online Link
Mind if I tell everyone why Lif isn't popular? It's heal skill needs a slim potion, making the benefit of a Lif very low. Along with that, there are items that increase walking speed that are now readily available. But Lif's probably one of the cooler looking homonculi, other than the flan.
Logos

Again?
Banned








Since: 07-24-06

Since last post: 5902 days
Last activity: 5992 days
Posted on 10-12-06 11:53 PM, in Firefox Add-Ons! Link
Inline Google Definitions is good too, and it works very quickly and painlessly as well.
Here's the link.
Anyone use the gmail space extension? I have it, but I haven't really tried it, anyone know how well it works?


(Last edited by Logos on 10-13-06 02:55 AM)
Logos

Again?
Banned








Since: 07-24-06

Since last post: 5902 days
Last activity: 5992 days
Posted on 10-13-06 12:49 AM, in Hey! The Asylum got a new name! Link
Originally posted by Xeios
Call it Asylum or Mad House or something like that. Not candly land, it scares me and makes me think of Child Molestation. You're not a child molester are you Xeo... Or Sexy Awesome as you go by now.

I do not understand, candy is sweet and sugary, children on the other hand are mean and icky. They smell funny, too. Therefore I affirm with Crazy Candy Land.
Although when looking at the definition of asylum, I wonder. The neologisms of a mental asylum are inconsistant with the definition of an asylum which is "refuge: a shelter from danger or hardship," according to wordnet. One does not lock crazy people in there, people lock themselves in there from other people.
Just my two pence.
Logos

Again?
Banned








Since: 07-24-06

Since last post: 5902 days
Last activity: 5992 days
Posted on 10-13-06 01:13 AM, in Hooray, life sucks! Link
I meant that sports is without practical use in a career situation whereas Speech is not. I have no plan of dropping out of or not going to college, I'm just rather down looking at my future expectations. Don't be mean.
"I bet you didn't even apply for any scholarships, just so you could complain about not getting one. Good show, you're truly a shining example of humankind."
I did. But I don't have the benefit of associations that others have, it's not exactly a original position that we as people live in.
Logos

Again?
Banned








Since: 07-24-06

Since last post: 5902 days
Last activity: 5992 days
Posted on 10-13-06 01:25 AM, in Hey! The Asylum got a new name! Link
No, in fact I have not. I know Candy Land is a game, but I do not know of the black vans and such. Forgive me.
Logos

Again?
Banned








Since: 07-24-06

Since last post: 5902 days
Last activity: 5992 days
Posted on 10-13-06 01:37 AM, in Ever get high just breathing? Link
A question. Are you talking about the joy of mere existance, or the joy of breathing? Because of the latter, I am cursed to not know of it.
Logos

Again?
Banned








Since: 07-24-06

Since last post: 5902 days
Last activity: 5992 days
Posted on 10-13-06 01:44 AM, in Hooray, life sucks! Link
Why would you think that? What do you mean by "You are pessimistic therefore, aren't all of us at times?"?
Logos

Again?
Banned








Since: 07-24-06

Since last post: 5902 days
Last activity: 5992 days
Posted on 10-14-06 11:32 PM, in Religious comics Link
I have something to say about the droobl comic. I think it's not a hoax, what does the author have to gain, look at his comments, he even says "I've decided to use this space to vent. ." I think what happened to its author is something very real that happens to people: a traumatic event causes them to question their current ideas about life. Everything doesn't fit together so well anymore, tragedy makes one see things differently.

The second comic is the sort that bothers me. While the author of droobl is questioning life, there really isn't much the author of this comic does except makes shots at Islam. It's a didatic comic too, and lacks emotion unlike droobl's.

To respect the ultimatum that is presented to "respect religion," I'm not going to go into the entire issue about the Bible or Islam, with respect to each comic. (Just wondering, since we're just supposed to say what we think and not debate the topic, isn't this general discussion material?)
Logos

Again?
Banned








Since: 07-24-06

Since last post: 5902 days
Last activity: 5992 days
Posted on 10-15-06 03:53 PM, in Japanese Link
Sorry if I was unclear, but I can't really see any of your japanese text, just the romanji. It comes out as garbled characters such as "ae"s and the paragraph symbol.

I would be obliged if you could help me to fix that problem, if you know how.
Is "yuuzaana" written as ユーザー名?
Logos

Again?
Banned








Since: 07-24-06

Since last post: 5902 days
Last activity: 5992 days
Posted on 10-15-06 09:03 PM, in What do you consider a opinion? Link
Originally posted by Xeios
Originally posted by Logos
For example, it is my opinion that .SK is not contributing to this thread. One cannot say that my opinion regarding .SK's thread contribution is right or wrong, namely because it's my opinion. Right and wrong are statements meant for questions like 1+1=2.


Though one could surely say that the argument insinuated by your opinion is popularly incorrect as he added a bit of humor to the thread whilst you only said that his humor(in your opinion) was inappropriate.


Just to clarify, terms like "correct" and "incorrect" are not normative statements, they are positive statements. To provide yet another example, one wouldn't say killing is incorrect, they would say killing is wrong or immoral or whatsnot. Sorry if I didn't make clear what I defined a opinion as, but now I will get to the point.
For the purpose of this debate, I define an opinion as a normative statement. I for one cannot see any instances that opinion is not a normative statement, so anyone feel free to debate my definition.
[EDIT] Corrected ambiguous usage of "it."


(Last edited by Logos on 10-16-06 12:11 AM)
Logos

Again?
Banned








Since: 07-24-06

Since last post: 5902 days
Last activity: 5992 days
Posted on 10-16-06 12:48 AM, in Drugs Link
Personally, I don't think that anyone on the board knows enough about the chemical nature of drugs to judge if they have any net effect on genius. Or do very many people in the world, in fact.
But I'm pretty sure that Mozart was a genius from childhood, and wasn't a child drug abuser or alcoholic.
I don't think I would do what anyone considers "drugs" and I don't have the intent of doing alcohol or smoking or any of that stuff, and I can completely symphatize with anyone who is bothered by those who would pressure or do it nearby.
But, I think that that's their choice, if they aren't bothering anyone else by their actions, it's up to them. For example, someone wouldn't be entitled to drink alcohol and then drive, because they are endangering the lives of other drivers.
Logos

Again?
Banned








Since: 07-24-06

Since last post: 5902 days
Last activity: 5992 days
Posted on 10-16-06 07:47 PM, in What do you consider a opinion? Link
There is no such thing as a "true" or "false" opinion, it's an impossibility. It's all up to an individual's or body's value judgement of an opinion. Again, "true" and "false" are positive statements. The following will better explain the concepts.



Positive science
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Positive (social sciences))
Jump to: navigation, search

In the humanities and social sciences, the term positive is used in a number of ways.

One usage refers to analysis or theories which only attempt to describe how things are, as opposed to how they should be. In this sense, the opposite of positive is normative. An example would be positive, as opposed to normative, economic analysis. Positive statements are also often referred to as descriptive statements.

The term positive lies at the heart of one of the major epistemological debates in the humanities and social sciences. Positivists (in the humanities and social sciences) on the one hand, advocate a 'value-free' approach to the study of humanity that shares much in common with methods employed in the natural sciences. Positivists seek only to make objective descriptions of humanity and society without making normative judgements. In contrast non-positivists reject the notion that the methods of the natural sciences are adequate in explaining and describing humanity and society - this is primarily because of the 'meanings' that humans attach to their actions. They believe that it is not possible to be completely value-free in their study, as a person cannot stand totally removed from their place within space and history. Humanistic Sociology is an example of a post-positive approach to social science.

Another sense of the word positive is used to describe things which are defined by construction, as opposed to things which are defined "negatively", by the absence of something else. Examples are negative and positive rights, or negative and positive liberty.




In philosophy, normative is usually contrasted with positive, descriptive or explanatory when describing types of theories, beliefs, or statements. Descriptive (or constative) statements are falsifiable statements that attempt to describe reality. Normative statements, on the other hand, affirm how things should or ought to be, how to value them, which things are good or bad, which actions are right or wrong.


Moving on to the definition of immorality, I reject the definition stated by Vulcanlogic, and present my own.
Morality is s system of value judgements based on a overlying set of social norms. Therefore, immortality is inconsistancy with these judgements.
I am now open for questions and clarifications.
[EDIT] Duh, changed immortality to immorality. I noticed when kaijin said it. =


(Last edited by Logos on 10-17-06 11:37 PM)
Logos

Again?
Banned








Since: 07-24-06

Since last post: 5902 days
Last activity: 5992 days
Posted on 10-16-06 08:04 PM, in Porcupines float?!! Link
Wouldn't the quill part be on top, rendering the part with the head on the bottom, and underwater? Which means they would still drown?
Unless of course, something can float under something, in which case I would think a porcupine would be the otherworldly creature for the phenomenon of floating under a Snapple cap. I ought to try that.
Logos

Again?
Banned








Since: 07-24-06

Since last post: 5902 days
Last activity: 5992 days
Posted on 10-17-06 09:15 PM, in Rebellion of Agraethia Link
Originally posted by Elara
Logos, the "..." is known as an ellipse. Just a little FYI.

Anywho, again I feel that a bit of description of the setting would be nice to help visualize the story as it happens. Bit better on the commas this time I noticed, but you also might want to find words other than "quickly" to use in describing speed.


Ellipse is an oval isn't it? I didn't say ellipsis because I didn't want anyone to mistake what I meant. Granted I don't know much about your story, Vulcanlogic, but I can't implicate what the "..."s are trailing off to, an ellipsis is an implicated ommision, not a break in thought. Perhaps commas, or a period instead?

Originally posted by Vulcanlogic
I like the metric system better, more precise, easier to use, more common, ect. Also, it is somewhat assumed that this is a medival period, though the entire setting, the situation with the country, or even where the characters are is to be explained later.

Isn't that an anachronism, seeing as the metric system is relatively new (a few centuries old)?
A stylistic point, vary your sentence structure a bit, it's a bit redundant and would read a lot better (in my opinion) if you made some simple changes.


Logos

Again?
Banned








Since: 07-24-06

Since last post: 5902 days
Last activity: 5992 days
Posted on 10-17-06 09:26 PM, in What do you consider a opinion? Link
Originally posted by Kaijin Surohm
An opinion is an opinion. A statement of which you feel that you believe is right. And in such, you have no right to reject one's statement of anything, but you have the right to ignore it.

Mortality is the frail existance upon which human kind, and all othe other species live. It is one's knowledge of their limits of just how far they can go.

Immortaity is based on more then one idealogy. One idea of immortality is the though of living forever. Another idea of immortality is your thoughts and dreams are carried on through existance for all times.
By case of the second idea, someone who is never forgotten is theorietically immortal. Like, Thomas Jefferson, or Mozart. They're work will never be forgotten, and thus they can never be snuffed from existance.

Sorry, my mistake, I meant "immorality." If no one has the right to reject someone's opinion, then there would be no such thing as a debate, or an argument, more or less. One can only argue about something which is indefinite.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32
Xeogaming Forums - - Posts by Logos



xeogaming.org

AcmlmBoard 1.92++ r4 Baseline
?2000-2013 Acmlm, Emuz, Blades, Xkeeper, DarkSlaya*, Lord Alexandor*
*Unofficial Updates
Page rendered in 0.231 seconds.
0.038